- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 氯氰菊酯降解菌株 Rhodococcus sp. H-3 和 H-4 的分离鉴定及其降解机制的研究    

姓名:

 仲芳雅    

学号:

 2022116048    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 071005    

学科名称:

 理学 - 生物学 - 微生物学    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 理学硕士    

学校:

 南京农业大学    

院系:

 生命科学学院    

专业:

 微生物学    

研究方向:

 环境微生物学    

第一导师姓名:

 黄星    

第一导师单位:

 南京农业大学    

完成日期:

 2025-05-10    

答辩日期:

 2025-05-22    

外文题名:

 Isolation, Identification, and Degradation Mechanism of Cypermethrin-Degrading Bacterial Strains Rhodococcus sp. H-3 and H-4    

中文关键词:

 氯氰菊酯 ; Rhodococcus sp. H-3 ; Rhodococcus sp. H-4 ; 酯酶 ; 分泌表达    

外文关键词:

 Cypermethrin ; Rhodococcus sp. H-3 ; Rhodococcus sp. H-4 ; Esterase ; Secretory expression    

中文摘要:

氯氰菊酯(Cypermethrin)是拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂的代表品种之一,其具有高效、广谱、低哺乳动物毒性的特点,被广泛用于农业、卫生和家庭害虫防治。但随着使用年限的不断延长和使用量的不断增加,使其在土壤中和农副产品表面大量残留。由氯氰菊酯残留造成的环境污染和食品安全问题,引起人们的广泛关注。研究表明微生物在氯氰菊酯降解过程中发挥重要作用。目前国内外对于氯氰菊酯的微生物降解已取得了系列进展,但是这些菌株与降解酶大多对氯氰菊酯降解活性较低。因此,筛选高效降解的微生物菌株和挖掘具有高催化活性和功能的基因和酶还需进一步研究。本论文分离得到两株氯氰菊酯降解菌株,从代谢途径,降解基因及酶学水平上解析了氯氰菊酯的微生物代谢机制;分析了降解菌株修复氯氰菊酯污染过程中土壤细菌群落结构的变化过程;同时,构建功能菌株实现降解基因的分泌表达。具体研究内容和结果如下:

1. 氯氰菊酯降解菌株的分离、降解特性及代谢途径研究

采用富集培养的方法,从长年喷洒氯氰菊酯的茶园土壤里分离得到了两株氯氰菊酯降解菌株。通过菌株的生理生化特征及细菌16S rRNA比对分析构建的系统发育树,两个菌株均被鉴定为Rhodococcus sp.,分别命名为Rhodococcus sp. H-3和Rhodococcus sp. H-4。菌株H-3在7 d内对30 mg/L的氯氰菊酯降解率达83.48%。其降解氯氰菊酯的最适温度和pH分别为35°C和7.0,添加Ca2+能促进菌株H-3对氯氰菊酯的降解,而Al3+、Cd2+、Co2+、Cu2+、Ni2+和Zn2+对氯氰菊酯降解有明显的抑制作用。菌株H-4在7 d内对初始浓度为30 mg/L氯氰菊酯的降解率为77.10%。最适反应条件为40°C和pH 7.0。金属离子对氯氰菊酯的降解几乎无促进效果,Al3+、Co2+、Cu2+和Zn2+有明显的抑制效果。通过HPLC和HPLC-MS/MS鉴定了菌株H-3和H-4降解氯氰菊酯的代谢产物并推测其代谢途径,发现其均可以将氯氰菊酯水解为3-苯氧基苯甲酸(3-PBA)和二氯菊酸。

2. 菌株H-3和H-4修复氯氰菊酯污染土壤的细菌群落结构分析

分别利用菌株H-3和H-4降解土壤中氯氰菊酯残留,结果发现10 d内,菌株H-3和H-4可将土壤中5 mg/kg的氯氰菊酯分别降解至1.71和2.06 mg/kg。通过16S rRNA高通量测序探究了菌株H-3和H-4修复氯氰菊酯污染过程中土壤细菌群落结构的动态变化过程。Alpha和Beta多样性分析表明氯氰菊酯处理的土壤样品中细菌群落结构多样性和丰富度降低,添加菌株H-3和H-4有助于其多样性和丰富度的恢复。门水平相对丰度结果推测,氯氰菊酯可能对Actinobacteriota门和Bacteroidota门的菌株生长存在抑制作用,而Proteoobacteria门的菌株可能能以氯氰菊酯为碳氮源生长。属水平相对丰度结果表明,氯氰菊酯对Dokdonella_A属、Ferruginibacter属的菌株生长可能存在抑制作用,Brevundimonas属的菌株可能能以氯氰菊酯为碳氮源刺激自身生长,推测Symbiobacterium属能够利用氯氰菊酯的代谢产物生长。

3. 酯酶基因的克隆表达、酶学特性研究及分泌表达

基于菌株H-3和H-4的基因组信息,通过比较基因组分析从菌株H-3和H-4中各鉴定到一个氯氰菊酯酯酶基因分别命名为cymE1和cymE2。经HPLC和HPLC-MS/MS验证纯酶对氯氰菊酯的降解效果,发现酯酶CymE1和CymE2降解氯氰菊酯的产物均为3-PBA和二氯菊酸。序列分析表明,酯酶基因cymE1全长822 bp,编码273个氨基酸,与已报道氨基酸序列最高同源性为33.5%;酯酶基因cymE2全长861 bp,编码286个氨基酸,与已报道氨基酸序列最高同源性为55.1%。两者均属于酯酶Family V,且均不存在跨膜区域和信号肽,属于胞内酶。两个酯酶都具有的Gly-X-Ser-X-Gly保守五肽结构以及催化活性位点Ser-Asp-His。

酶学研究表明,CymE1和CymE2的最适温度分别为30℃和40℃,均在4℃的时候稳定性最好。酶促反应最适pH均为8.0。添加Al3+、Co2+、Cu2+、Ni2+、Zn2+和Fe3+对CymE1和CymE2的活性都有抑制作用,Mn2+和Ca2+对CymE1和CymE2均有促进作用。CymE1水解氯氰菊酯的Vmax、Km和Kcat值分别为0.18 µM S-1、32.31 µM和1.78×10-2 S-1。CymE2水解氯氰菊酯的Vmax、Km和Kcat值分别为0.22 µM S-1、15.08 µM和2.24×10-2 S-1。CymE2对于氯氰菊酯的亲和力和催化效率优于CymE1。

采用双交换策略成功构建了功能菌株Bacillus sp. SCK6-E,实现了酯酶CymE1在菌株Bacillus sp. SCK6中的分泌表达。对分泌表达条件进行优化,发现其最佳培养基为SR培养基,最佳发酵温度为37℃。在最优条件下,菌株Bacillus sp. SCK6-E可在84 h内完全降解30 mg/L的氯氰菊酯。菌株Bacillus sp. SCK6-E发酵液对茶树叶片中残留的氯氰菊酯有良好的去除效果,在发酵液中浸泡2 h,茶树叶片上氯氰菊酯残留的相对去除率可达57.83%。

外文摘要:

Cypermethrin is one of the representative species of synthetic pyrethroid insecticides, which is widely used in agriculture, health and household pest control because of its high efficiency, broad spectrum and low mammalian toxicity. However, with the prolonged service life and increasing use, it has caused a large number of residues in soil and on the surface of agricultural by-products, and the environmental pollution and food safety problems caused by cypermethrin residues have aroused widespread concern. Environmental pollution and food safety problems caused by cypermethrin residues have attracted widespread attention. Studies have shown that microorganisms play an important role in the degradation process of cypermethrin. A series of progress has been made in the microbial degradation of cypermethrin, but most of these strains and enzymes have low degradation activity for cypermethrin. Therefore, the identification of microbial strains with high degradation efficiency and the mining of genes and enzymes with high catalytic activity and function need to be further investigated. In this study, two cypermethrin-degrading bacterial strains were isolated, and the microbial metabolic mechanism of cypermethrin was analyzed in terms of metabolic pathways, degradation genes and enzymology; the changes in soil bacterial community structure during the remediation of cypermethrin contamination by degrading bacterial strains were analyzed; and at the same time, the functional strains were constructed to realize the secretion and expression of degradation genes. The details and results of the study are as follows:

1. Study on the isolation, degradation characteristics and metabolic pathway of cypermethrin-degrading bacterial strains

Two cypermethrin-degrading bacterial strains were isolated from the soil of tea plantations sprayed with cypermethrin for many years by enrichment culture method. Through the physiological and biochemical characteristics of the strains and the phylogenetic tree constructed by bacterial 16S rRNA comparison analysis, both strains were identified as Rhodococcus sp. and named Rhodococcus sp. H-3 and Rhodococcus sp. H-4, respectively. The degradation rate of cypermethrin by strain H-3 reached 83.48% at 30 mg/L within 7 d. The optimal temperature and pH for the degradation of cypermethrin were 35°C and 7.0, respectively. The addition of Ca2+ promoted the degradation of cypermethrin by strain H-3, while the degradation was inhibited by Al3+, Cd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+.The degradation of cypermethrin by strain H-4 was 77.10% at an initial concentration of 30 mg/L within 7 d. The optimum reaction conditions were 40°C and pH 7.0. The degradation of cypermethrin was hardly promoted by metal ions, while Al3+, Co2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ had obvious inhibitory effects. The degradation products of strains H-3 and H-4 were identified by HPLC and HPLC-MS/MS, and the metabolic pathways of H-3 and H-4 were investigated. It was found that both strains could hydrolyze cypermethrin to 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA) and 3-(2,2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid (DCVA).

2. Analysis of the bacterial community structure in the remediation of cypermethrin-contaminated soil by strains H-3 and H-4

The strains H-3 and H-4 were utilized to degrade cypermethrin remains in soil, respectively, and it was found that the strains H-3 and H-4 could degrade the cypermethrin at a concentration of 5 mg/kg in the soil to 1.71 and 2.06 mg/kg respectively, in 10 d. The dynamics of soil bacterial community structure during the remediation of cypermethrin contamination by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing was investigated by strains H-3 and H-4. Alpha and Betadiversity analyses showed that the diversity and richness of bacterial community structure were reduced in cypermethrin-treated soil samples and that the addition of strains H-3 and H-4 helped to restore the diversity and richness of bacterial community structure. The results of relative abundance at the phylum level suggested that cypermethrin might have an inhibitory effect on the growth of the strains of the phylum Actinobacteriota and Bacteroidota, while the strains of the phylum Proteobacteria might be able to use cypermethrin as a carbon and nitrogen source for growth. The results of relative abundance at the genus level indicated that cypermethrin might have an inhibitory effect on the growth of strains of the genera Dokdonella_A and Ferruginibacter, and strains of the genus Brevundimonas might be able to stimulate their growth by using cypermethrin as a source of carbon and nitrogen, and it was hypothesized that the genus Symbiobacterium was able to utilize the metabolites of cypermethrin for growth.

3. Cloning, expression, characterization and secretion of esterase gene

Based on the genomic information of strains H-3 and H-4, a cypermethrin esterase gene was identified from each of strains H-3 and H-4 by comparative genomic analysis named cymE1 and cymE2, respectively. The degradation of cypermethrin by pure enzymes was verified by HPLC and HPLC-MS/MS, and it was found that the products of cypermethrin degradation by the esterases CymE1 and CymE2 were 3-PBA and DCVA. Sequence analysis showed that, the esterase gene cymE1 has a full length of 822 bp, encoding 273 amino acids, and has the highest identity of 33.5% with the reported amino acid sequence; the esterase gene cymE2 has a full length of 861 bp, encoding 286 amino acids, and has the highest identity of 55.1% with the reported amino acid sequence. Both esterases belong to esterase Family V and are intracellular enzymes without transmembrane region and signal peptide. Both esterases have the conventional pentapeptide Gly-X-Ser-X-Gly and the catalytic triad Ser-Asp-His.

Enzymatic studies showed that the optimal temperatures of CymE1 and CymE2 were 30℃ and 40℃, respectively, the enzyme stability is best at 4°C. The optimal pH of the enzymatic reaction is both 8.0. Al3+, Co2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+and Fe3+ inhibits the activities of CymE1 and CymE2, while Mn2+ and Ca2+ enhances the activities of CymE1 and CymE2. The Vmax, Km and Kcat values of CymE1 hydrolyzed cypermethrin were 0.18 µM S-1, 32.31 µM and 1.78 × 10-2 S-1, respectively. The Vmax, Km and Kcat values of CymE2 hydrolyzed cypermethrin were 0.22 µM S-1, 15.08 µM and 2.24 × 10-2 S-1, respectively. CymE2 showed better affinity and catalytic efficiency for cypermethrin than CymE1.

A double crossover strategy was adopted to successfully construct a functional strain Bacillus sp. SCK6-E, achieve the secretion expression of esterase CymE1 in strain Bacillus sp. SCK6. The secretion expression conditions were optimized, and it was found that the optimal medium was SR medium, and the optimal fermentation temperature was 37°C. Under the optimal conditions, strain Bacillus sp. SCK6-E could completely degrade 30 mg/L of cypermethrin within 84 h. The fermentation temperature was 37℃. The fermentation broth of strain Bacillus sp. SCK6-E had a good effect on the removal of cypermethrin residue in tea leaves, and the relative removal rate of cypermethrin residue on tea leaves could reach 57.83% after 2 h of immersion in the fermentation broth.

参考文献:

[1] 党电邦,吕莹,湛金等.微生物在露天矿高陡坡面生态修复中的应用与展望[J].黄金,2024,45(12):13-19.

[2] 东秀珠,蔡妙英.常见细菌系统鉴定手册[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.

[3] 李静,曹溪桐,邱凯等.微生物菌剂对边坡绿化植物生长的影响[J].中国水土保持,2024,(09):56-59.

[4] 李永俊,王昆.环境污染对土壤微生物多样性的影响及生态修复技术分析[J].工业微生物,2025,55(01):228-230.

[5] 马轶君.土壤污染修复技术及土壤生态保护措施研究[J].科技资讯,2024,22(11):207-209.

[6] 秦曙,乔雄梧,朱九生等.实验室条件下氯氰菊酯在土壤中的降解[J].农药学学报,2000,2(3):68-73.

[7] 尚佳琦,王琪,田超等.高效氯氰菊酯对大鼠脑组织TH及TNF-α蛋白表达影响的研究[J].职业与健康,2019,35(16):2187-2190.

[8] 孙丽娜,黄开华,高新华等.具氯氰菊酯降解功能的植物内生细菌分离鉴定及降解特性研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2020,39(01):70-77.

[9] 王晓慧,商文贤,徐宏英等.高效氯氟氰菊酯的微生物降解研究进展[J].化学与生物工程,2020,37(03):7-14.

[10] 吴倩雯.京津冀地区市售水果中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留分析及风险评估[D].保定:河北大学,2024.

[11] 许育新,戴青华,李晓慧等.氯氰菊酯降解菌株CDT3的分离鉴定及生理特性研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2004,023(005):958-963.

[12] Ahamad A, Kumar J. Pyrethroid pesticides: An overview on classification, toxicological assessment and monitoring[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 2023, 10:100284.

[13] Arpigny J L, Jaeger K E. Bacterial lipolytic enzymes: Classification and properties[J]. Biochemical Journal, 1999, 343(1):177-183.

[14] Arthidoro de Castro M B, Martinez L C, Cossolin J F S, et al. Cytotoxic effects on the midgut, hypopharyngeal, glands and brain of apis mellifera honey bee workers exposed to chronic concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 248:126075.

[15] Bai L, Cai X L, Li M Y, et al. Countering beta-cypermethrin: Partitioning roles of the insect gut and its bacteria[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2023, 96(3):1243-1255.

[16] Bao W, Liu B, Simonsen D W, et al. Association between exposure to pyrethroid insecticides and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general us adult population[J]. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2020, 180(3):367-374.

[17] Bhatt P, Bhatt K, Huang Y, et al. Esterase is a powerful tool for the biodegradation of pyrethroid insecticides[J]. Chemosphere, 2020a, 244:125507.

[18] Bhatt P, Huang Y, Zhan H, et al. Insight into microbial applications for the biodegradation of pyrethroid insecticides[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10:1778.

[19] Bhatt P, Huang Y, Zhang W, et al. Enhanced cypermethrin degradation kinetics and metabolic pathway in Bacillus thuringiensis strain SG4[J]. Microorganisms, 2020b, 8(2):223.

[20] Bhatt P, Rene E R, Huang Y, et al. Indigenous bacterial consortium-mediated cypermethrin degradation in the presence of organic amendments and Zea mays plants [J]. Environmental Research, 2022, 212:113137.

[21] Bhatt P, Zhou X, Huang Y, et al. Characterization of the role of esterases in the biodegradation of organophosphate, carbamate, and pyrethroid pesticides[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 411:125026.

[22] Birolli W G, Vacondio B, Alvarenga N, et al. Enantioselective biodegradation of the pyrethroid (±)-lambda-cyhalothrin by marine-derived fungi[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 197:651-660.

[23] Borowik A, Wyszkowska J, Zaborowska M, et al. The impact of permethrin and cypermethrin on plants, soil enzyme activity, and microbial communities[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(3):2892.

[24] Chandra P, Enespa, Singh R, et al. Microbial lipases and their industrial applications: A comprehensive review[J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2020, 19:169.

[25] Chen C, Yu G, Guo Z, et al. Expression, characterization, fermentation, immobilization, and application of a novel esterase Est804 from metagenomic library in pesticide degradation[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13:922506.

[26] Cycoń M, Piotrowska Seget Z. Pyrethroid-degrading microorganisms and their potential for the bioremediation of contaminated soils: A review[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2016, 7:1463.

[27] Deng F, Sun J, Dou R, et al. Contamination of pyrethroids in agricultural soils from the yangtze river delta, china[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 731:139181.

[28] Ding J, Liu Y, Gao Y, et al. Biodegradation of λ-cyhalothrin through cell surface display of bacterial carboxylesterase[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 289:133130.

[29] Fan X, Liang W, Li Y, et al. Identification and immobilization of a novel cold-adapted esterase, and its potential for bioremediation of pyrethroid-contaminated vegetables[J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2017, 16(1):149.

[30] Farag M R, Alagawany M, Bilal R M, et al. An overview on the potential hazards of pyrethroid insecticides in fish, with special emphasis on cypermethrin toxicity[J]. Animals, 2021, 11(7):1880.

[31] Gajendiran A, Abraham J. An overview of pyrethroid insecticides[J]. Frontiers in Biology, 2018, 13(2):79-90.

[32] Gu X Z, Zhang G Y, Chen L, et al. Persistence and dissipation of synthetic pyrethroid pesticides in red soils from the yangtze river delta area[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2008, 30(1):67-77.

[33] Gu Y, Xu X, Wu Y, et al. Advances and prospects of Bacillus subtilis cellular factories: From rational design to industrial applications[J]. Metabolic Engineering, 2018, 50:109-121.

[34] Guo P, Wang B, Hang B, et al. Pyrethroid-degrading Sphingobium sp. JZ-2 and the purification and characterization of a novel pyrethroid hydrolase[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2009, 63(8):1107-1112.

[35] Ham J, You S, Lim W, et al. Bifenthrin impairs the functions of leydig and sertoli cells in mice via mitochondrion-endoplasmic reticulum dysregulation[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 266:115174.

[36] He J, Zhang K, Wang L, et al. Highly efficient degradation of cypermethrin by a co-culture of Rhodococcus sp. JQ-l and Comamonas sp. A-3[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022a, 13:1003820.

[37] He Q, Yang Q, Liu Q, et al. The effects of beta-cypermethrin, chlorbenzuron, chlorothalonil, and pendimethalin on and larvae reared[J]. Pest Management Science, 2022b, 78(4):1407-1416.

[38] Hu W, Lu Q, Zhong G, et al. Biodegradation of pyrethroids by a hydrolyzing carboxylesterase EstA from Bacillus cereus BCC01[J] 2019, 9(3):477.

[39] Huang P, Du J, Cao L, et al. Effects of prometryn on oxidative stress, immune response and apoptosis in the hepatopancreas of Eriocheir sinensis(Crustacea: Decapoda)[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023a, 262:115159.

[40] Huang Y, Chen S F, Chen W J, et al. Efficient biodegradation of multiple pyrethroid pesticides by Rhodococcus pyridinivorans strain Y6 and its degradation mechanism[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023b, 469:143863.

[41] Jin Z P, Luo K, Zhang S, et al. Bioaccumulation and catabolism of prometryne in green algae[J]. Chemosphere, 2012, 87(3):278-284.

[42] Kreig N R, Holt J G, Murray R G E, et al. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology[M]. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1989, 38(4):89-100.

[43] Legendre P. Studying beta diversity: Ecological variation partitioning by multiple regression and canonical analysis[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 1(1):3-8.

[44] Li Y, Jin K, Zhang L, et al. Development of an inducible secretory expression system in Bacillus licheniformis based on an engineered xylose operon[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(36):9456-9464.

[45] Liu H, Chen W J, Xu Z, et al. Unraveling the degradation mechanism of multiple pyrethroid insecticides by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its environmental bioremediation potential[J]. Environment International, 2025, 195:109221.

[46] Liu X, Liang M, Liu Y, et al. Directed evolution and secretory expression of a pyrethroid-hydrolyzing esterase with enhanced catalytic activity and thermostability[J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2017, 16(1):81.

[47] Loman N J, Misra R V, Dallman T J, et al. Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2012, 30(5):434-439.

[48] Luo X, Zhang D, Zhou X, et al. Cloning and characterization of a pyrethroid pesticide decomposing esterase gene, Est3385, from Rhodopseudomonas palustris PSB-S[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):7384.

[49] Ma Y, Chen L, Qiu J. Biodegradation of beta-cypermethrin by a novel Azoarcus indigens strain HZ5[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 2013, 48(10):851-859.

[50] Miao H, Zhe Y, Xiang X, et al. Enhanced extracellular expression of a Ca2+-and Mg2+-dependent hyperthermostable protease EA1 in Bacillus subtilis via systematic screening of optimal signal peptides[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2022, 70(50):15830-15839.

[51] Naloka K, Polrit D, Muangchinda C, et al. Bioballs carrying a syntrophic Rhodococcus and Mycolicibacterium consortium for simultaneous sorption and biodegradation of fuel oil in contaminated freshwater[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 282:130973.

[52] Prado R, Rioboo C, Herrero C, et al. The herbicide paraquat induces alterations in the elemental and biochemical composition of non-target microalgal species[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 76(10):1440-1444.

[53] Rajak P, Roy S, Ganguly A, et al. Agricultural pesticides–friends or foes to biosphere[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 2023, 10:100264.

[54] Ranatunga M, Kellar C, Pettigrove V. Toxicological impacts of synthetic pyrethroids on non-target aquatic organisms: A review[J]. Environmental Advances, 2023, 12:100388.

[55] Ravula A R, Yenugu S. Pyrethroid based pesticides-chemical and biological aspects[J]. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2021, 51(2):117-140.

[56] Sharma R, Jindal R. Assessment of cypermethrin induced hepatic toxicity in catla catla: A multiple biomarker approach[J]. Environmental Research, 2020, 184:109359.

[57] Shi Y H, Xiao J J, Feng R P, et al. In-vitro bioaccessibility of five pyrethroids after human ingestion and the corresponding gastrointestinal digestion parameters: A contribution for human exposure assessments[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 182:517-524.

[58] Sun Y, Yin S, Feng Y, et al. Molecular basis of the general base catalysis of an α/β-hydrolase catalytic triad[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2014, 289(22):15867-15879.

[59] Sundaram S, Das M T, Thakur I S. Biodegradation of cypermethrin by Bacillus sp. In soil microcosm and in-vitro toxicity evaluation on human cell line[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2013, 77:39-44.

[60] Tallur P N, Mulla S I, Megadi V B, et al. Biodegradation of cypermethrin by immobilized cells of Micrococcus sp. Strain CPN 1[J]. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2015, 46(3):667-672.

[61] Tian J, Long X, Tian Y, et al. Enhanced extracellular recombinant keratinase activity in Bacillus subtilis SCK6 through signal peptide optimization and site-directed mutagenesis[J]. RSC Advances, 2019, 9(57):33337-33344.

[62] Tian Y, Zhao G, Cheng M, et al. A nitroreductase DnrA catalyzes the biotransformation of several diphenyl ether herbicides in Bacillus sp. Za[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2023, 107(16):5269-5279.

[63] Tiwary M, Dubey A K. Cypermethrin bioremediation in presence of heavy metals by a novel heavy metal tolerant strain, Bacillus sp. AKD1[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2016,108:42-47.

[64] Trees R P. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1987, 4(4):406-425.

[65] Wang B Z, Guo P, Hang B J, et al. Cloning of a novel pyrethroid-hydrolyzing carboxylesterase gene from Sphingobium sp. strain JZ-1 and characterization of the gene product[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(17):5496-500.

[66] Wang C, Chen Q, Wang R, et al. A Novel Angular Dioxygenase Gene Cluster Encoding 3-Phenoxybenzoate 1’,2’-Dioxygenase in Sphingobium wenxiniae JZ-1[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2014, 80(13):3811-3818.

[67] Wu X, Zhang C, An H, et al. Biological removal of deltamethrin in contaminated water, soils and vegetables by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia XQ08[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 279:130622.

[68] Xiao Y, Lu Q, Yi X, et al. Synergistic degradation of pyrethroids by the quorum sensing-regulated carboxylesterase of Bacillus subtilis BSF01[J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020, 8:889.

[69] Yang F, Xu Q F. Advance in studies on diversity of microorganism in soil[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2002, 22(6):39-41.

[70] Yang L, Lou J, Wang H, et al. Use of an improved high-throughput absolute abundance quantification method to characterize soil bacterial community and dynamics[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018,633:360-371.

[71] Yang L H, Qiao B, Xu Q M, et al. Biodegradation of sulfonamide antibiotics through the heterologous expression of laccases from bacteria and investigation of their potential degradation pathways[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 416:125815.

[72] Yao G, Gao J, Zhang C, et al. Enantioselective degradation of the chiral alpha-cypermethrin and detection of its metabolites in five plants[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26:1558-1564.

[73] Yoon S H, Ha S M, Kwon S, et al. Introducing ezbiocloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2017, 67(5):1613-1617.

[74] Zhang J, Lu L, Chen F, et al. Detoxification of diphenyl ether herbicide lactofen by Bacillus sp. Za and enantioselective characteristics of an esterase gene lacE[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 341:336-345.

[75] Zhang M, Yang K, Yang L, et al. A novel cold-adapted pyrethroid-degrading esterase from Bacillus subtilis J6 and its application for pyrethroid-residual alleviation in food matrix[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2024a, 463:132847.

[76] Zhang Y, Xiang D, Tang J, et al. Expression of a novel hydrolase MhpC in Brevibacillus parabrevis BCP-09 and its characteristics for degrading synthetic pyrethroids[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2024b, 204:106100.

[77] Zhao J, Jiang Y, Gong L, et al. Mechanism of β-cypermethrin metabolism by Bacillus cereus GW-01[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 430:132961.

[78] Zhou T, Guo T, Wang Y, et al. Carbendazim: Ecological risks, toxicities, degradation pathways and potential risks to human health[J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 314:137723.

[79] Zong W, Su W, Xie Q, et al. Expression, characterization, and immobilization of a novel SGNH esterase Est882 and its potential for pyrethroid degradation[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13:1069754.

[80] Birolli W G, Dos Santos A, Pilau E, et al. New role for a commercially available bioinsecticide: Bacillus thuringiensis berliner biodegrades the pyrethroid cypermethrin[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(8):4792-4803.

[81] Chrustek A, Hołyńska-Iwan I, Dziembowska I, et al. Current research on the safety of pyrethroids used as insecticides[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2018, 54(4):61.

[82] Jiang W, Gan J. Importance of fine particles in pesticide runoff from concrete surfaces and its prediction[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(11):6028-6034.

[83] Tang A X, Liu H, Liu Y Y, et al. Purification and characterization of a novel β-cypermethrin-degrading aminopeptidase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa GF31[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017, 65(43):9412-9418.

[84] Tang J, Liu B, Chen T T, et al. Screening of a beta-cypermethrin-degrading bacterial strain Brevibacillus parabrevis BCP-09 and its biochemical degradation pathway[J]. Biodegradation, 2018, 29(6):525-541.

[85] Zhang C, Jia L, Wang S, et al. Biodegradation of beta-cypermethrin by two Serratia spp. with different cell surface hydrophobicity[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(10):3423-3429.

[86] Zhang C, Wang S, Yan Y. Isomerization and biodegradation of beta-cypermethrin by Pseudomonas aeruginosa CH7 with biosurfactant production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(14):7139-7146.

[87] Behera B K, Chakraborty H J, Patra B, et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals bacterial and fungal diversity and their bioremediation potential from sediments of river ganga and yamuna in india[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 11:556136.

中图分类号:

 Q939    

开放日期:

 2025-06-14    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式