在全球化浪潮与城市化进程不断推进的时代背景下，文学作为文化领域中不可或缺的重要组成部分，正逐渐被赋予更为深远且重要的使命，在推动城市形象塑造、提升城市文化软实力方面，发挥着愈发显著的作用。南京作为承载着悠久历史与深厚文化底蕴的六朝古都，在漫长的发展历程中，始终秉持着文学与城市空间相互交融、相互渗透的优良传统。南京的文学脉络贯穿于城市的大街小巷、亭台楼阁之间，与城市空间紧密相连，共同勾勒出南京独特的文化景观。2019年，南京荣膺“世界文学之都” 的称号，这一殊荣不仅是对南京在全球文学版图中重要地位的高度认可，更为这座城市的文学性空间发展带来了崭新的契机。然而，反观目前南京的世界文学之都建设以及文学性空间的保护、利用现状，其面临着空间功能单一化、空间的文学价值未得到充分挖掘、环境文学氛围淡化活力热度低等一系列问题。因此，针对南京文学性空间更新的相关研究亟待展开，而目前关于文学之都的研究多集中于文学领域，空间视角以及风景园林学科领域的研究目前并不多。结合世界文学之都的背景，深入分析南京的文学性空间，对于南京的文学性空间更新以及文学之都建设具有理论参考与实践指导意义。

本文以南京的文学性空间为研究对象，结合南京世界文学之都建设的背景，运用理论研究、实地调研、定量分析、AHP层次分析以及实证分析的研究方法，从多维度深入分析南京文学性空间活力热度表现，构建评价体系解析文学性空间发展现状，结合文学性空间更新所面临的问题与挑战提出对应更新策略，结合国内外案例、实地调研分析以及具体案例更新进行实证分析，以期为南京世界文学之都的建设和文学性空间的活力提升提供参考，研究结论主要包括：

空间活力热度作用指标和研究对象特征分类：参考相关文献理论，根据活力评价目标特征，确定活力原生性、活力聚集性、活力多样性、活力相关性的分析目标。在众多影响因子选择空间分布、公园绿地、可达性、功能混合度、百度指数搜索热度、大众点评评论数等具有代表性的指标，根据不同指标特征，将其归纳为不同的评价维度包括原生动力层、创意发展层、创意实践层。根据研究对象属性特征对其进行了分类优化，具体包括城市文学遗产、城市文学遗产、文学创意产业三类。

空间活力热度在多指标作用下的驱动力权重：运用AHP层次分析法，通过20名本专业师生以及15名文学相关专业师生、文学爱好者、文学文艺工作从业者进行专家打分，赋予各层指标评价权重。最后得到城市维度各目标层权重由高到低依次为：活力多样性（0.58）＞活力聚集性（0.27）＞活力相关性（0.15）；片区维度各类型指标评价维度权重由高到低依次为：原生动力层（0.444）＞创意实践层（0.293）＞创意发展层（0.263）。

南京文学性空间活力热度多维度多尺度的分布特征：南京市范围内，不同类型文学性空间的活力热度最终得分由高到低依次为：城市文学空间＞城市文学遗产＞文学创意产业。城市文学遗产在空间分布上具有优势，但网络搜索热度和周边功能混合度有待提升；城市文学空间功能混合度高且在社交媒体平台上活跃度高，但覆盖度存在不足；文学创意产业在功能融合和实际运营方面表现良好，但受空间布局和网络热度限制。片区范围内文学性空间的分析结果表明，其活力热度呈现不均衡态势，高活力空间多集中在市中心和知名景区周边；中活力空间部分指标表现良好但存在短板；低活力空间在多个关键指标上表现欠佳。

不同维度空间更新策略的实践应用性：通过对文学性空间分布特征和更新所面临的问题与挑战的分析总结，结合国内外案例，从城市、片区、空间三个维度提出空间更新策略，包括城市维度构建文学性空间活力网络与协同发展体系、片区维度强化片区文学性空间协同与特色发展、空间维度提升单个文学性空间品质与吸引力。结合不同类型案例包括芥子园、乌衣巷节点和一间很小的书店的考察与分析以及具体案例玄武湖玄圃的分析更新改造进行实证分析，验证更新策略的实践应用性。

Under the backdrop of the continuous advancement of the globalization wave and the urbanization process, literature, as an indispensable and crucial part of the cultural field, is gradually being entrusted with a more profound and significant mission. It plays an increasingly prominent role in promoting the shaping of the city's image and enhancing the city's cultural soft power. As the ancient capital of six dynasties with a long history and profound cultural heritage, Nanjing has always adhered to the fine tradition of the mutual integration and penetration of literature and urban space throughout its long development process. The literary context of Nanjing runs through the streets and alleys, pavilions and towers of the city, and is closely connected with the urban space, jointly outlining the unique cultural landscape of Nanjing. In 2019, Nanjing was honored with the title of "City of Literature". This honor is not only a high recognition of Nanjing's important position in the global literary landscape, but also brings new opportunities for the development of the city's literary spaces. However, when looking at the current construction of Nanjing as a City of Literature, as well as the current situation of the protection and utilization of literary spaces, it faces a series of problems such as the simplification of spatial functions, the insufficient exploration of the literary value of the space, the weakening of the literary atmosphere in the environment, and the low vitality and popularity. Therefore, relevant research on the renewal of Nanjing's literary spaces is urgently needed. At present, the research on Cities of Literature mostly focuses on the literary field, and there is not much research from the spatial perspective and in the field of landscape architecture. Combining with the background of the City of Literature of the World and conducting an in-depth analysis of Nanjing's literary spaces has theoretical reference and practical guiding significance for the renewal of Nanjing's literary spaces and the construction of the City of Literature.

This paper takes the literary spaces in Nanjing as the research object. Against the backdrop of the construction of Nanjing as a City of World Literature, it employs research methods such as theoretical research, field investigation, quantitative analysis, AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and empirical analysis. It conducts an in-depth multi-dimensional analysis of the performance of the vitality and popularity of Nanjing's literary spaces, constructs an evaluation system to analyze the current development status of literary spaces, and proposes corresponding renewal strategies in combination with the problems and challenges faced by the renewal of literary spaces. Through empirical analysis based on domestic and international cases, field investigation analysis and specific case renewals, it aims to provide references for the construction of Nanjing as a City of World Literature and the enhancement of the vitality of literary spaces. The main research conclusions are as follows:

Classification of Spatial Vitality and Popularity Indicators and Research Object Characteristics: Drawing on relevant literature and theories, and based on the characteristic evaluation objectives of vitality, the analytical objectives of vitality originality, vitality aggregation, vitality diversity, and vitality correlation were determined. Among numerous influencing factors, representative indicators such as spatial distribution, park green spaces, accessibility, functional mixture degree, Baidu Index search popularity, and Dianping review counts were selected. According to the characteristics of these indicators, they were categorized into different evaluation dimensions, including the original driving force layer, creative development layer, and creative practice layer. The research objects were classified and optimized based on their attribute characteristics, specifically including three types: urban literary heritage, urban literary spaces, and literary creative industries.

Driving Force Weights of Spatial Vitality and Popularity under Multi-Indicator Effects: Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), expert scoring was conducted by 20 faculty and students in the field, 15 faculty and students in literature-related disciplines, literary enthusiasts, and literature and art industry practitioners to assign evaluation weights to indicators at each layer. The final weights for each target layer at the urban dimension, from highest to lowest, are: vitality diversity (0.58) > vitality aggregation (0.27) > vitality correlation (0.15). For the district dimension, the evaluation dimension weights for each indicator type, from highest to lowest, are: original driving force layer (0.444) > creative practice layer (0.293) > creative development layer (0.263).

Multi-Dimensional and Multi-Scale Distribution Characteristics of Vitality and Popularity in Nanjing’s Literary Spaces: Within Nanjing’s urban scope, the final scores of vitality and popularity for different types of literary spaces, from highest to lowest, are: urban literary spaces > urban literary heritage > literary creative industries. Urban literary heritage has advantages in spatial distribution but requires improvement in network search popularity and surrounding functional mixture degree; urban literary spaces exhibit high functional mixture degree and active social media engagement but have insufficient coverage; literary creative industries perform well in functional integration and actual operations but are constrained by spatial layout and network popularity. Analysis of literary spaces within specific districts shows unbalanced vitality and popularity: high-vitality spaces are mostly concentrated around the city center and famous scenic areas; medium-vitality spaces perform well in some indicators but have shortcomings; low-vitality spaces show poor performance in multiple key indicators.

Practical Application of Spatial Renewal Strategies across Dimensions: Through analyzing the distribution characteristics of literary spaces and the challenges in their renewal, combined with domestic and international cases, spatial renewal strategies were proposed from three dimensions—urban, district, and spatial. These include constructing a vitality network and collaborative development system for literary spaces at the urban dimension, strengthening collaborative and characteristic development of literary spaces at the district dimension, and enhancing the quality and attractiveness of individual literary spaces at the spatial dimension. Empirical analysis was conducted through investigations and analyses of different types of cases, including the Mustard Seed Garden, Wuyi Lane Node, and "A Very Small Bookstore," as well as the renewal and reconstruction of Xuanpu in Xuanwu Lake, to verify the practical applicability of the renewal strategies.

[1] 联合国教科文组织. 联合国教科文组织官网 [OL] . [2024-12-31]. https://www.unesco.org/en/creative-cities.

[2] Esther H.K. Yung, Yi Sun. Power relationships and coalitions in urban renewal and heritage conservation: The Nga Tsin Wai Village in Hong Kong [J] . Land Use Policy, 2020, 99:104811.

[3] 葛红兵, 刘卫东. 世界文学之都的启示——上海文化原创力培育与公共文化发展 [J] . 探索与争鸣, 2014(12):78-81.

[4] 戴俊骋, 那鲲鹏, 单雪婷. 世界文学之都对中国城市申都启示 [J] . 文化学刊, 2019(02): 24-29.

[5] Bell D, Orozco L. Neighbourhood arts spaces in place: cultural infrastructure and participation on the outskirts of the creative city [J] . International Journal Of Cultural Policy, 2021,27(1): 87-101.

[6] Bonakdar, A., & Audirac, I. City Branding and the Link to Urban Planning: Theories, Practices, and Challenges [J] . Journal Of Planning Literature, 2019, 35(2): 147-160.

[7] Cudny, W., Comunian, R., & Wolaniuk, A.Arts and creativity: A business and branding strategy for Lodz as a neoliberal city [J] . Cities, 2020.100(C): 102659-102659.

[8] 张杰.创意城市理念下的南京“世界文学城市”旅游品牌营销 [J] .扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 22(02): 60-66, 73.

[9] 王艳, 彭忠益. 国外城市更新研究述评:目标原则､因果机制与研究展望 [J] .城市治理研究,2018, 3(01): 139-153,4-5.

[10] Daniel K, Marc R. Culturalization and urban horticulture in two World Heritage cities [J] . Food Culture & Society, 2020, 23(3): 315-333.

[11] Li, X. F. Cultural creative economy and urban competitiveness: How one matters to the other [J] . JournalOf Urban Affairs, 2020: 1-16.

[12] Monachesi P. Shaping an alternative smart city discourse through Twitter: Amsterdam and the role of creative migrants [J] . Cities, 2020, 100(C): 102664-102664.

[13] Rodrigues M, Franco M . Taxonomy of Holistic Performance of Current Creative Cities: Empirical Study [J] . Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2020, 146(1): 04019030-04019030.

[14] 林秀琴. 作为文化议题的创意经济与创意城市 [J] . 文化产业研究, 2015, (03): 22-32.

[15] Rodríguez-Pose A, Lee N. Hipsters vs. geeks? Creative workers, STEM and innovation inUS cities [J] . Cities, 2020, 100(C): 102653-102653.

[16] 丁志刚, 张京祥, 关心等. 社会资本如何参与城市更新 [J] .城市规划, 2023, 47(11): 40-45.

[17] Tranos E. Social Network Sites and Knowledge Transfer: An Urban Perspective [J] . Journal of Planning Literature, 2020, 35(4): 408-422.

[18] 联合国教科文组织. 联合国教科文组织创意城市网络与可持续发展 [M] . Paris: UNESCO,2021: 279.

[19] 全国教科文创意城市网络研究与发展联盟推进办公室. 联合国教科文组织创意城市网络在中国 [R] . 上海:全国教科文创意城市网络研究与发展联盟推进办公室, 2022.1.

[20] 邓冰艳. 文学空间 [J] . 外国文学, 2023, (05): 115-126.

[21] 万娜. “文学性”:多个维度构建的弹性空间 [J] . 遵义师范学院学报, 2008, (03): 20-24，28.

[22] 李志艳. 论文学地理学中的文学性问题与空间批评 [J] . 南京社会科学, 2019, (02): 150-156.

[23] 张娟. 异质空间视角下鲁迅杂文的文学性 [J] . 新疆大学学报(哲学·人文社会科学版), 2017, 45 (02): 124-129.

[24] 暴丽. 电影场景空间与“文学性”的间性融和 [J] . 时代文学(上半月), 2011, (10): 244-245.

[25] 凯文•林奇著, 林庆怡等译. 城市形态 [M] . 北京: 华夏出版社, 2001.

[26] Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities [M] . New York: Random HouseLLC, 1961.5.

[27] 凯文·林奇著, 方益萍､何晓军译. 城市意象 [M] . 北京: 华夏出版社, 2001.

[28] 扬•盖尔著, 何人可译. 交往与空间 [M] .北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1992.

[29] 刘易斯·芒福德著, 宋俊岭､倪文彦译. 城市发展史——起源､演变和前景 [M] . 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2005.

[30] 汤安佶. 荔枝网新闻 [OL] . [2025-5-8]. https://news.jstv.com

[31] 南京日报. 南京社科网 [OL] . [2025-5-8]. https://ass.nanjing.gov.cn

[32] 刘颂, 赖思琪. 大数据支持下的城市公共空间活力测度研究 [J] . 风景园林, 2019, 26(05):24-28.

[33] 党安荣，张丹明，李娟，等 . 基于时空大数据的城乡景观规划设计研究综述 [J] . 中国园林，2018, 34(03): 5-11.

[34] 王玉琢. 基于手机信令数据的上海中心城区城市空间活力特征评价及内在机制研究 [D] . 南京: 东南大学, 2017.

[35] 张程远, 张淦, 周海瑶. 基于多元大数据的城市活力空间分析与影响机制研究——以杭州中心城区为例 [J] .建筑与文化, 2017, (09): 183-187.

[36] 汪海, 蒋涤非. 城市公共空间活力评价体系研究 [J] . 铁道科学与工程学报, 2012, 9 (01): 56-60.

[37] 杜书瀛译注, 李渔著. 闲情偶寄 [M] . 北京: 中华书局, 2014: 745.

[38] 文翘楚. 李渔的造园思想研究 [D] . 南京: 东南大学, 2015.

[39] 周应合. 景定建康志 [M] . 南京: 南京出版社, 2009.

[40] 邓瑗, 姜淼. “文学之都”背后——南京市民文学生活与南京文学大众接受度的一种考察 [J] . 文学研究, 2020, (02): 183-196.

[41] 李育菁, 竺頔. 场域与资本理论视角下世界“文学之都”的建构脉络研究 [J] . 出版发行研究, 2021, (05): 98-104.

[42] 戴艳清, 高亮, 孙英姿. 基于S-O-R理论的新型公共阅读空间用户流失行为分析——来自大众点评网用户评论 [J] . 图书馆理论与实践, 2023, (04): 55-62,71.

[43] 徐清, 周璇, 周思文. 基于多源数据的城市边缘区范围识别与城市活力评价——以杭州市主城区为例 [J] .城市发展研究, 2024, 31(01): 80-88.

[44] 韩继统, 李岚, 邱冰等. 基于空间数据的夜市空间活力及其影响因素——以南京老城区为例 [J] . 南方建筑, 2021, (06): 68-75.

[45] 武凤文, 陈明远. 基于Citespace的国外公共空间活力近十五年研究热点趋势及借鉴研究 [J] . 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(08): 6-12.

[46] 刘颂, 赖思琪. 基于多源数据的城市公共空间活力影响因素研究——以上海市黄浦江滨水区为例 [J] . 风景园林, 2021, 28(03): 75-81.

[47] 王伟强, 马晓娇. 基于多源数据的滨水公共空间活力评价研究——以黄浦江滨水区为例 [J] . 城市规划学刊, 2020, (01): 48-56.

[48] 罗桑扎西, 甄峰. 基于手机数据的城市公共空间活力评价方法研究——以南京市公园为例[J] . 地理研究, 2019, 38(07): 1594-1608.

[49] 张莹. 城市街区活力测度及影响机制研究 [D] . 武汉: 武汉大学, 2019.

[50] 雷诚, 谢佳琪. 居住型历史街区公共空间活力评价体系建构及应用——以苏州大儒巷历史街区为例 [J] . 中国名城, 2018, (06): 77-84.

[51] 陆明, 蔡籽焓. 原住民空间融合下的历史文化街区活力提升策略 [J] . 规划师, 2017, 33(11): 17-23.

[52] 黄秋实. 南京老城社区型共享街道空间建构与活力营造 [D] . 南京: 东南大学, 2017.

[53] 叶宇, 庄宇. 新区空间形态与活力的演化假说:基于街道可达性､建筑密度和形态以及功能混合度的整合分析 [J] . 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(02): 43-49.

[54] 韩乐, 李铌. 基于公共空间活力的城市历史街区评价体系研究 [J] . 湘潭大学自然科学学报, 2014, 36(03): 122-126.

[55] 苟爱萍, 王江波. 基于SD法的街道空间活力评价研究 [J] . 规划师, 2011, 27(10): 102-106.

[56] 曹钟茗, 甄峰, 李智轩等. 基于手机信令数据的城市时间活力模式及影响因素研究——以南京市中心城区为例 [J] . 人文地理, 2022, 37(06): 109-117.

[57] 尹静一, 汤晓敏, 王云. 人本视角下滨水公共空间活力评估与调控研究——以上海黄浦江核心段为例 [J] .中国园林, 2022, 38(09): 81-86.

[58] 王林森, 郑重, 周素红等. 基于街景感知的城市空间品质对空间活力的影响作用研究 [J] .规划师, 2022,38(03): 68-75.

[59] 黄婧. 基于多源大数据的西安回坊生活性街道活力测度研究 [D] . 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2021.

[60] 史宜, 李婷婷, 杨俊宴. 基于手机信令数据的城市滨水空间活力研究——以苏州金鸡湖为例 [J] . 风景园林, 2021, 28(01): 31-38.

[61] 包亚芳, 孙治, 宋梦珂等. 基于居民感知视角的浙江兰溪传统村落公共空间文化活力影响因素研究 [J] . 地域研究与开发, 2019, 38(05): 175-180.

[62] Liu S, Long Y, Zhang L, et al. Quantitative measurement of urban spatial vitality by integrating physicalbuilt environment and subjective perception dimensions [J] . Environment and Planning B: Urban Analyticsand City Science, 2025, 52(1): 131-149.

[63] Yuan M, Yang J, Gong J, et al. Strategies for Enhancing Rural Vitality from the Perspective of Comprehensive Land Consolidation: Integrating Production, Living, Ecology, and Efficiency Enhancement [J] . Land, 2024, 13(12): 2092-2092.

[64] Ge Y, Gan Q, Ma Y, et al. Spatial Vitality Detection and Evaluation in Zhengzhou’s Main Urban Area [J] . Buildings, 2024, 14(11): 3648-3648.

[65] Rong H. Improvement of the Vitality of Public Space under the Background of Urban Renewal [J] . Journal of Landscape Research, 2024, 16(5): 38-40, 45.

[66] Chen L, Jiang X, Tan L, et al. Analysis of Spatial Vitality Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Old Neighborhoods: A Case Study of Ya’an Xicheng Neighborhood [J] . Buildings, 2024, 14(11): 3348-3348.

[67] Wen Z, Zhao J, Li M. A Study on the Influencing Factors of the Vitality of Street Corner Spaces in Historic Districts: The Case of Shanghai Bund Historic District [J] . Buildings, 2024, 14(9): 2947-2947.

[68] Li S, Ye Y, Chen H, et al. Vitality Analysis and Improvement of Micro Urban Spaces in Cold Regions:Planning Analysis and Simulation [J] . International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 2024, 12(3): 95-117.

[69] Luo C, Wang C, Jin M. Refined Measure of Street Space Vitality based on Digital Technology [J] . Journal of Research in Science and Engineering, 2024, 6(5): 57-60.

[70] Zhang J, Zhou W, Lian H, et al. Research on Optimization Strategy of Commercial Street Spatial VitalityBased on Pedestrian Trajectories [J] . Buildings, 2024, 14(5): 1240.

[71] Zhou Q, Zheng Y. Evaluation Research on the Spatial Vitality of Huaihe Road Commercial Block in Hefei City Based on Multi-Source Data Correlation [J] . Sustainability, 2024, 16(8): 3372.

[72] Li Z, Lu Y, Zhuang Y, et al. Influencing factors of spatial vitality in underground space around railway stations: A case study in Shanghai [J] . Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2024, 147: 105730-.

[73] Liu Y, Guo X. A Dynamic Prediction Framework for Urban Public Space Vitality: From Hypothesis to Algorithm and Verification [J] . Sustainability, 2024, 16(7): 2846.

[74] Song J, Zhu Y, Chu X, et al. Research on the Vitality of Public Spaces in Tourist Villages through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of Mochou Village in Hubei, China [J] . Land, 2024, 13(3): 359.

[75] Abdulameer N H, Jaberi A A A ,Khafaji A S A, et al. Evaluating of Urban Space Vitality: The Role ofSafety, Security, and Urban Planning in the Religion Center of Kufa City, Iraq [J] . International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 2024, 19(1): 155-167.

[76] 高晗. 文化消费视角下西安顺城巷南段街道更新策略研究 [D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学,2021.

[77] 刘奇. 历史文化街区公共空间活力评价与更新策略 [D] . 苏州: 苏州科技大学, 2021.

[78] 余丽蓉. 城市转型更新背景下的城市文化空间创新策略探究——基于场景理论的视角 [J] . 湖北社会科学, 2019, (11): 56-62.

[79] 宋凤, 陈业东. 基于PSPL调研法的传统社区公共空间微更新策略研究——以济南将军庙历史文化街区为例 [J] . 中国名城, 2019, (09): 55-60.

[80] 郝赤彪, 杨禛. 基于空间句法的潍坊坊茨小镇历史文化街区活化及更新策略研究 [J] . 小城镇建设, 2016, (09): 32-37.

[81] 郭湘闽, 王金灿. 基于空间句法的深圳东门老街公共空间更新策略研究 [J] . 规划师, 2014, 30(05): 89-95.

[82] 郭湘闽, 全水. 基于空间句法的喀什历史文化街区空间及其更新策略分析 [J] . 建筑学报, 2013, (S2): 8-13.

[83] 伍欣兰. 基于多源数据的长沙市中心区社区公园空间活力评价与影响因素研究[D] . 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2024.

[84] 李泽楷. 基于活力评价的寒地商业街道空间优化研究 [D] . 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2024.

[85] 李有芳, 李天翼, 吴冠萌等. 老旧小区户外活动空间活力评价与更新策略研究 [J] . 建筑学报, 2023, (S2): 174-180.

[86] 高祥, 盛况, 汪坚强. 城市更新背景下社区公共空间活力评价与提升策略研究——以北京市劲松街道为例 [J] . 城市环境设计, 2023, (04): 250-258.

[87] 张奉芊成, 贺佳璇, 王琛. 城市更新视角下商业街空间活力测度与提升策略探究——以西安市东､西大街为例 [J] . 城市建筑, 2022, 19(07): 1-5, 40.

[88] 余英杰. 基于Arc GIS的南宁市“三街两巷”历史文化街区活力分析 [J] . 城市建筑, 2022, 19(07): 75-77, 89.

[89] 严益明. 城市青年空间活力特征挖掘与影响因素地理分析 [D] . 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.

[90] 钱晶. 基于空间活力的城市绿道使用评价､影响分析及布局优化研究 [D] . 武汉: 武汉大学, 2019.

[91] 陈菲. 严寒城市公共空间景观活力评价研究 [D] . 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2016.

[92] 《世界文学之都 南京》编写组. 世界文学之都:南京 [M] . 南京: 南京出版社, 2022: 300.