近几年我国女性吸毒人员比例增大，给家庭和社会带来了巨大的危害，我国的禁毒戒毒形势不容乐观。由于女性吸毒人员的特殊性、隐蔽性、情感性，这也加大了女性吸毒人员戒毒工作的难度。协同治理理论伴随着新公共管理学的发展而出现，协同治理强调治理权利的非官僚性，旨在构建平等、共识、沟通、协商、信任、激励的制度保障体系和运行机制，来促进社会治理目标的实现。女性吸毒人员是社会群体中不可忽视的组成部分，戒毒工作事关社会的安全稳定，属于社会治理问题，所以双重的社会性就决定了女性吸毒人员的戒毒工作需要运用协同治理理论。因此，本论文介绍了江苏省女子强制隔离戒毒所女性吸毒人员戒毒工作的现状以及困境，分析原因，在协同治理视角下提出相应的对策建议。

江苏省女子强制隔离戒毒所一直致力于研究女性吸毒人员的戒毒管理模式，并已经在守规意识、家庭关系修复、社会回归上取得了一定的成效，但仍有一些不足。笔者调查发现女性吸毒人员存在文化程度低、家庭不和谐、无业主者居多、复吸率高等特点，而导致复吸的原因有家庭压力大，社会包容度低、再就业渠道狭窄等，得出我国女性吸毒人员戒毒工作存在着全过程中协同不到位，内外协同联动不到位，协同治理主体参与不到位等困境。在对国内外戒毒工作的对比中，笔者深刻意识到戒毒工作仅仅依靠政府实行强制隔离戒毒必然会导致女性戒毒工作成效不高，究其根本原因一是没有完善的法律法规，二是没有健全的协同治理机制，三是治理主体存在壁垒，公众参与度不高，没有形成合力，未能给予充分支持。 因此想要真正解决我国女性吸毒人员戒毒工作中存在的困境，从协同治理角度看需要完善以下几方面工作第一，完善法律法规，从立法上、社会保障上来保驾护航；第二建立健全协同治理机制，例如建立组织合作机制、信息共享机制、监督考核机制、激励机制，确保工作管理有方、分工明确、落实有声。第三打破主体壁垒，加大政府、社会、家庭、企业等社会各界的参与力量，促进多元主体治理。

In recent years, the proportion of female drug addicts in China has increased, which has brought great harm to the family and the society.Due to the particularity, concealment and emotionality of female drug addicts, it also increases the difficulty of drug addicts for female drug addicts. The theory of collaborative governance emerged with the development of new public management. Collaborative governance emphasizes the non-bureaucratic nature of governance rights, and aims to build an institutional guarantee system and operating mechanism of equality, consensus, communication, negotiation, trust, and incentives to promote social governance. achievement of goals. Female drug addicts are an integral part of social groups that cannot be ignored. Drug rehabilitation work is related to social security and stability and is a social governance issue. Therefore, the dual social nature determines that female drug addicts need to use collaborative governance theory for drug addicts. Therefore, This paper introduces the ssituation and difficulties of drug treatment for female drug addicts in Jiangsu Compulsory Isolation Drug Treatment Institute, analyzes the reasons, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions from the perspective of co-governance.

Jiangsu Women's Compulsory Isolation Drug Rehabilitation Center is a drug rehabilitation center specially designed to accommodate female drug addicts. It has been committed to researching the drug addict management model for female drug addicts, and has achieved certain results in compliance awareness, family relationship restoration, and social return. , but there are still some shortcomings. The author conducted a survey on female drug addicts currently housed in women's compulsory isolation drug rehabilitation centers in Jiangsu Province, and found that female drug addicts have the characteristics of low education level, disharmonious families, most of them without owners, and high relapse rate, which lead to the reasons for relapse. There are high family pressures, low social tolerance, and narrow re-employment channels. It is concluded that there are difficulties in the work of female drug addicts in my country, such as insufficient coordination in the whole process, insufficient internal and external collaborative linkage, and insufficient participation of the main body of collaborative governance. In the comparison of domestic and foreign drug rehabilitation models, the author deeply realizes that relying solely on the government to implement compulsory isolation and drug rehabilitation will inevitably lead to the ineffectiveness of female drug rehabilitation work. The third is that the participation of the governance bodies is not high, no synergy is formed, and sufficient support is not given. Therefore, in order to truly solve the predicament existing in the drug rehabilitation work of female drug addicts in china, from the perspective of collaborative governance, it is necessary to improve the following aspects. First, improve laws and regulations, and escort from legislation and social security; second, establish a collaborative governance mechanism , including cooperation mechanism, information sharing mechanism, supervision and assessment mechanism, and incentive mechanism to ensure proper work management, clear division of labor, and sound implementation. Third, break down the barriers of the main body, increase the participation of the government, society, families, enterprises and other sectors of society, and promote the governance of multiple subjects.

[1]国家禁毒委员会.2020 年中国禁毒报告[R].北京：公安部国家禁毒委员会，2020.

[2]英国国家毒品滥用维持治疗机构.2003年1月关于98研究报告[R].英国：英国国家毒品滥用维持治疗机构，2003.

[3]Tomori C，Go V，Quan V，et al． Research paper: “In their perception we are addicts”: Social vulnerabilities and sources ofsupport for men released from drug treatment centers in Vietnam[J].Int J Drug Policy． 2014，25: 897 － 904

[4]Hatah E，Kien Ping L，Adliah Mohd A，et al． The influence of cultural and religious orientations on social support and its potential impact on medication adheren[J]．Patient Prefer Adherence，2015，9: 589 － 596

[5]马特．G．M．范德普尔．个人支持网概述[J]．国外社会学，1994（4).

[6]全球治理委员会.我们的全球伙伴关系[M].牛津大学出版社,1995.

[7]张维.浅谈女性复吸的心理原因及其预防[J].学理论,2013(08):63-64+105.

[8]郝学敏,姜峰,杨遇林,侯晓娟,王凤兰,阎晓丽.女性戒毒人员述情障碍与自我接纳的相关分析[J].中国社会医学杂志,2016,33(03):226-228

[9]李一波,李静,毛富强,李蔓薇,王旭,李申.天津市女性吸毒人员抑郁症状及其影响因素[J].医学与社会,2021,34(01):85-88+99.DOI:10.13723/j.yxysh.2021.01.018.

[10]肖惠斌．关于解除强制隔离戒毒三年以上人员的调查分析和比较研究[J]．中国司法,2015(4)：37-44.

[11]姚维. 毒品成瘾者戒毒-复吸过程中的社会支持研究[J].中国药物依赖性杂志,2017（01）

[12]许丰盛. 我国强制隔离戒毒工作现状及其完善 [J].辽宁警察学院学报, 2016, 1 8(01): 42-7.

[13]秦黎宾, 赵政豪, 陆开宗. 我国戒毒模式的应然与实然初探——从共性看戒毒模式未来的趋势 [J].中国司法, 2018, 05): 87-90.

[14]龚尧,沈聃琳,谢靓,罗丹,徐榕婧,李静.社区层面下戒毒及康复模式的现状[J].中国药

物依赖性杂志,2020,29(06):425-429.DOI:10.13936/j.cnki.cjdd1992.2020.06.005.

[15]杨清华.协同治理：我国治道变革的一种战略选择[J].汕头大学学报,2014,9(2):8-9.

[16]王有强，叶岚.协同治理[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2015

[17]朱纪华.协同治理：新时期我国公共管理范式的创新与路径[J].上海经济管理干部学报,2015,18(6):23.

[18]鲁赫鸣.侦查人员必须了解的毒品的基本特征与分类[J].吉林公安高等专科学校学报,2003(06):30-31.

[19]赫尔曼·哈肯.协同学-大自然构成的奥秘[M]．凌复华译．上海：上海译文出版社，2004.

[20]詹姆斯·N·罗西瑙．没有政府的治理[M]．张胜军，刘小林等译．南昌：江西人民出版社，2001．

[21]ANSELL C，GASH A． Collaborative governance in theory and practice[J]． J Publ Adm Res Theor，2008，18 ( 4) : 543 -571.

[22]李辉，任晓春． 善治视野下的协同治理研究[J]科学与管理,2010( 6) : 55 － 58

[23]杨志军．多中心协同治理模式研究: 基于三项内容的考察[J]．中共南京市委党校

学报,2010( 3) : 42 － 49

[24]刘晓．协同治理: 市场经济条件下我国政府治理范式的有效选择[J].中共杭州市委

党校学报,2007( 5) : 64 － 70

[25]杨清华.协同治理: 治道变革的一种战略选择[J].南京航空航天大学学报( 社会科

学版) ,2011( 1) : 31 － 34

[26]何水.从政府危机管理走向危机协同治理———兼论中国危机治理范式革新[J]．江南社会学院学报,2008( 6) : 23 － 26

[27]沙勇忠，解志元．论公共危机的协同治理[J]．中国行政管理,2010( 4) : 73 － 77

[28]濮炜斌. 广东省S戒毒所降低复吸率的协同治理机制研究[D].兰州大学,2019.

[29]李薇，姜锡明．非营利组织的协同治理与绩效评估[J]．商场现代化，2006( 7) :302 － 303

[30]张洪武． NPO 新的治理模型: 多中心协同治理研究[J]．理论研究,2007( 6) : 42 － 45

[31]陈彧.问题与歧视：标签理论视野下的戒毒工作[J].中国药物滥用防治杂志,2008(03):185-187.

[32]刘柳,王盛.吸毒人群心理体验的质性分析——基于标签理论的视角[J].河南警察学院学报,2019,28(05):5-11.DOI:10.16231/j.cnki.jhpc.2019.05.001.

[33]黄敏.标签理论视角下的戒毒康复研究[J].云南警官学院学报,2012(02):26-28.

[34]陈平.马克思恩格斯论人的社会化及其现代意义[J].岭南学刊,2011(02)，128

[35]顾晨. 强制隔离戒毒人员复吸原因及对策研究[D]. 中国人民公安大学, 2019.

[36]高鹏.政社合作:社会企业参与戒毒人员社会融入研究——以昆明市Q社会企业为个案[J] . 中国非营利评论, 2017(01)

[37]仝强. 强制隔离戒毒人员回归社会管理的研究[D]. 内蒙古师范大学, 2017.

[38]李一黎,万长智,郑明,张榕芳,邓刚.英国禁毒戒毒法律制度及启示[J].中国司法,2012(09):102-108.

[39]杨细桂.中英两国戒毒模式对比[J].特区实践与理论,2014(02):61-64.

[40]张晴,张义平,王建伟,张涛,于萍,倪玉霞.中外戒毒资源配置比较[J].云南警官学院学报,2014,(02):25-30.

[41]高洁. 司法行政强制隔离戒毒研究[D].长春理工大学,2019.

[42]刘金鹏.戒毒人员高复吸率问题研究[J].中国刑事法,2013,18(5):33-34.