- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 保障性租赁住房REITs的效益与风险研究——以中金厦门安居REIT为例    

姓名:

 王苏妮    

学号:

 2022818050    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 025100    

学科名称:

 经济学 - 金融    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 金融硕士    

学校:

 南京农业大学    

院系:

 金融学院    

专业:

 金融(专业学位)    

研究方向:

 房地产金融    

第一导师姓名:

 何亮    

第一导师单位:

 南京农业大学    

第二导师姓名:

 朱丽华    

完成日期:

 2024-05-28    

答辩日期:

 2024-05-28    

外文题名:

 Research on the Benefits and Risks of Affordable Rental Housing REITs: A Case Study of CICC Xiamen Anju REIT    

中文关键词:

 保障性租赁住房REITs ; 效益 ; 风险 ; 中金厦门安居REIT    

外文关键词:

 affordable rental housing REITs ; benefit ; risk ; CICC Xiamen Anju REIT    

中文摘要:

在“租购并举”背景下,房地产行业面临较大的战略转型压力。随着城镇化率的提升,人口流动规模增大,新市民、青年人买不起房也租不到好房的问题日益突出,为缓解住房供需矛盾,在政策指引下,我国保障性租赁住房建设于2021年如火如荼地展开,成为解决城市住房问题的重要途径。但由于其存在项目周期长、投资回报低、流动性差等问题,传统融资模式并不能满足大规模建设的开展。保障性租赁住房REITs应运而生,有效地吸引了社会资本的投入,盘活了存量资产,大大降低了租赁住房行业的杠杆率和金融风险。作为基础设施公募REITs的新发行版块,保障性租赁住房REITs自上市以来表现出较强的运营稳健性,整体收入完成度和息税折旧摊销前利润完成度均超过100%,业绩排名在所有上市REITs行业中最高,体现了其自身优秀的持有价值。然而,作为一种“全新”的融资模式和金融产品,保障性租赁住房REITs的效益和风险问题也具有自身的独特性。与国外REITs相比,保障性租赁住房REITs底层资产为基础设施,运作结构采用“公募基金+基础设施资产支持证券”的模式,极具中国特色。在国家政策持续加码下,展开REITs项目的效益与风险研究,对产品本身健康发展十分必要,同时对于投资者的资产配置提供新思路。

本文便聚焦于我国金融资本市场改革的重点领域——保障性租赁住房REITs,从中选取具有代表性的首单发行产品中金厦门安居REIT,以该个例出发对保障性租赁住房REITs效益与风险进行研究。本文首先对于国内外现有研究进行梳理,对于保障性租赁住房行业以及保障性住房REITs现状进行分析,阐明选择该案例的理由。其次,对于中金厦门安居REIT的发行情况、基础设施项目、原始权益人、发行动因进行介绍,基于产品的运作架构,并结合产品的财务业绩数据,二级市场换手率、成交量、溢价率、超额收益率、波动率,基础设施的出租率、租金水平,原始权益人的财务数据,运用对比分析法、蒙特卡洛模拟、Z-score模型等方法,从投资者、基础设施项目、原始权益人以及社会维度进行效益分析,从投资者、基础设施项目、其他参与主体维度进行风险分析。最后,对于案例研究内容进行总结,并从该典型个案出发,拓展至保障性租赁住房REITs领域的产品,分析其整体的效益与风险特征,发现保障性租赁住房REITs可以为投资者带来长期价值的增长、促进基础设施项目的稳健运行、提升原始权益人的偿债能力和盈利能力、提高社会整体生活质量,但其二级市场表现暂时不佳,收入来源单一,主要依靠基础设施项目的租金收入,受租金增速和住房空置率影响较大。在研究结论基础上,本文提出引导投资者理性配置、多元化保证基础设施资产的收入来源、建立租金长期调价机制、完善基础设施REITs税制设计等政策建议,以期更好促进我国保障性租赁住房REITs的良性循环发展。

外文摘要:

In the context of "simultaneous rental and purchase", the real estate industry is facing greater pressure for strategic transformation. In order to alleviate the contradiction between housing supply and demand, under the guidance of policies, the construction of affordable rental housing in China will be in full swing in 2021 and has become an important way to solve the urban housing problem. However, due to the problems of long project cycle, low return on investment, and poor liquidity, the traditional financing model cannot meet the needs of large-scale construction. Affordable rental housing REITs came into being, effectively attracting the investment of social capital, revitalizing the stock assets, and greatly reducing the leverage ratio and financial risk of the rental housing industry. As a new issuance sector of infrastructure public REITs, affordable rental housing REITs have shown strong operational stability since their listing, with the overall revenue completion and EBITDA completion rate exceeding 100%, ranking the highest among all listed REITs in the industry, reflecting its own excellent holding value. However, as a "brand-new" financing model and financial product, the benefits and risks of affordable rental housing REITs also have their own uniqueness. Compared with foreign REITs, the underlying asset of affordable rental housing REITs is infrastructure, and the operation structure adopts the model of "public fund + infrastructure asset-backed securities", which is very Chinese characteristics. Under the continuous increase of national policies, it is necessary to carry out research on the benefits and risks of REITs projects for the healthy development of the product itself, and at the same time provide new ideas for investors' asset allocation.

This paper focuses on the key area of China's financial capital market reform, affordable rental housing REITs, and selects the representative first issuance product, CICC Xiamen Anju REIT, to study the benefits and risks of affordable rental housing REITs based on this case. This paper first reviews the existing research at home and abroad, analyzes the current situation of the affordable rental housing industry and affordable housing REITs, and clarifies the reasons for choosing this case. Based on the operational structure of the product, combined with the financial performance data of the product, the turnover rate, trading volume, premium rate, excess rate of return, volatility rate of the secondary market, the occupancy rate and rental level of the infrastructure, and the financial data of the original owner, the comparative analysis method, Monte Carlo simulation, Z-score model and other methods are used to analyze the relationship between investors, infrastructure projects, and the financial data of the original owner. The original equity holder and the social dimension are analyzed for benefits, and the risk analysis is carried out from the dimensions of investors, infrastructure projects, and other participants. Finally, this paper summarizes the content of the case study, starts from this typical case, expands to the products in the field of affordable rental housing REITs, analyzes its overall benefits and risk characteristics, and finds that affordable rental housing REITs can bring long-term value growth to investors, promote the steady operation of infrastructure projects, improve the solvency and profitability of the original owners, and improve the overall quality of life of the society, but their secondary market performance is temporarily poor, and the source of income is single. It mainly relies on the rental income of infrastructure projects, which is greatly affected by the rental growth rate and the housing vacancy rate. On the basis of the research conclusions, this paper puts forward policy suggestions such as guiding investors to rationally allocate, diversifying the income sources of infrastructure assets, establishing a long-term rent adjustment mechanism, and improving the tax system of infrastructure REITs, in order to better promote the virtuous cycle development of affordable rental housing REITs in China.

参考文献:

[1]陈静怡,赖芨宇,王颖林.REITs应用于PPP模式的风险价值评估研究[J].建筑经济,2019,40(11):68-71.

[2]陈英楠,莫东翠,唐思华,李慧慧.测量中国房地产政策不确定性研究[J].经济学(季刊),2022,22(02):405-424.

[3]顾家明,汪霄.基于熵权法-CIM的公租房REITs融资风险评价[J].建筑经济,2019,40(07):116-120.

[4]郭杰,饶含.土地资产价格波动与经济中的流动性供给——基于以地融资视角的研究[J].金融研究,2022(07):76-93.

[5]何兴强,杨锐锋.房价收入比与家庭消费——基于房产财富效应的视角[J].经济研究,2019,54(12):102-117.

[6]侯成琪,肖雅慧.住房价格与经济增长:基于中间品需求渠道及其乘数效应的分析[J].经济研究,2022,57(04):120-137.

[7]胡峰,张秀娟,李俊俊.REITs产权类资产估值方法的实践探讨[J].证券市场导报,2022,No.365(12):43-49+75.

[8]雷鸣,刘泞玮,王丹丹等.基于CRITIC-云模型的基础设施REITs项目风险评估方法及应用[J].地方财政研究,2023,No.221(03):102-112.

[9]李博,王霄.房产税改革的经济与福利效应:基于异质性个体模型的研究[J].世界经济,2023,46(05):90-118.

[10]李婷婷,孙宇剑.基础设施公募REITs底层资产评估方法探析[J].建筑经济,2021,42(S2):105-108.

[11]李泽正,盛磊.中国基础设施REITs收益与风险特征研究[J].宏观经济研究,2022,No.286(09):97-105.

[12]刘建建,王忏,龚六堂.土地金融、房地产税与去杠杆[J].经济科学,2023(01):118-135.

[13]刘晓.我国住房租赁资产证券化风险及其防范研究[J].西南金融,2018,No.447(10):30-34.

[14]孟明毅.不动产信托投资基金的美国经验借鉴[J].经济与管理评论,2020,36(01):124-136.

[15]秦颖,孙丽梅.组态视角下公募REITs底层资产选择研究——以美国样本进行实证研究[J].金融理论与实践,2021(09):80-88.

[16]孙聪,刘霞,姚玲珍.新时代住房供应如何契合租购群体的差异化需求?——以上海市为例[J].财经研究,2019,45(01):75-88.

[17]孙三百,孙鹏,张可云.中国城市住房不平等的空间特征分析[J].经济学家,2022(07):109-118.

[18]涂宇涛.基于蒙特卡洛模拟的地产项目投资风险分析——以H房地产公司某项目投资为例[J].房地产世界,2022,No.379(23):15-18.

[19]王鹏飞,宋恒旭,易平.REITs折溢价与风险影响因素分析[J].证券市场导报,2022(12):57-67.

[20]吴迪,张楚然,侯成琪.住房价格、金融稳定与宏观审慎政策[J].金融研究,2022(07):57-75.

[21]星焱.公募REITs支持新型城镇化:机理、问题与对策[J].证券市场导报,2021(4):12-19.

[22]叶菁菁,谢尚,余建宇,蒲火元.租售同权政策与住房租购市场联动[J].世界经济,2022,45(03):161-184.

[23]虞琪琪.美国REITs反避税制度及对我国的借鉴[J].南方金融,2021(11):93-99.

[24]赵扶扬,梅冬州.“稳房价”与“调结构”双重目标下的房价调控政策研究[J].经济学(季刊),2023,23(03):1226-1244.

[25]周广肃,王雅琦.住房价格、房屋购买与中国家庭杠杆率[J].金融研究,2019(06):1-19.

[26]邹旭,马贤磊,石晓平.保障性住房供应如何影响商品房价——挤出供给抑或分流需求?[J].财经研究,2021,47(11):49-63.

[27]Abugri B A, Dutta S. Are we overestimating REIT idiosyncratic risk? Analysis of pricing effects and persistence[J]. International Review of Economics&Finance, 2014, 29(29): 249-259.

[28]Basse T, Friedrich M, Bea E V. REITs and the financial crisis: Empirical evidence from the U.S.[J]. International Journal of Business&Management, 2009, 4(11).

[29]Cheung W M, Chung R, Fung S. The Effects of Stock Liquidity on Firm Value and Corporate Governance:Endogeneity and the REIT Experiment[J]. Journalof Corporate Finance, 2015, 35: 211-231.

[30]Chinmoy G, Milena P. The Effect of Legal Environment and Regulatory Structure on Performance: Cross-Country Evidence from REITs[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2020, 63(prepublish).

[31]Cotter J, Sullivan N O, Rossi F. The conditional pricing of systematic and idiosyncratic risk in the UK equity market[J]. International Review of Financia l Analysis, 2015, 37(12): 184-193.

[32]Dabara I D. Evolution of REITs in the Nigerian real estate market[J]. Journal of Property Investment amp; Finance, 2021, 40(1): 38-48.

[33]DiBartolomeo J A, Gatchev V A, Harrison D M. The Liquidity Risk of REITs[J]. Journal of Real Estate Research, 2021, 43(1).

[34]Faten B B, Manish T. Common risk factors and risk–return trade-off for REITs and treasuries[J]. Journal of Asset Management, 2023, 24(5): 374-395.

[35]Feng Z F, Wu Z H. Local Economy, Asset Location and REIT Firm Growth[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2021.

[36]Giannotti C, Mattarocci G. Risk Diversification in a Real Estate Portfolio: Evidence from the Italian Market[J]. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 2013, 269(3): 86-87.

[37]Huerta-Sanchez D, Ngo T N, Pyles M K. Institutional Ownership and REIT Acquisitions[J]. Applied Economics, 2021, 53(36): 4207-4228.

[38]Ijaz A. Aggregate earnings-returns relation: insights from REITs[J]. Cogent Business Management, 2022, 9(1).

[39]Jian L, Yan C, Shufei L, et al. Information spillovers in Hong Kong REITs and related asset markets[J]. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2023, 92215-229.

[40]Jihwan Y, Seoki L, M P J, et al. The impact of environmental management on firm performance in the U.S. lodging REITs: The moderating role of outside board of directors[J]. Tourism Economics, 2023, 29(2): 513-532.

[41]Jufri M M, Graeme N. The evolution of Belgium REITs[J]. Journal of Property Investment Finance, 2019, 37(4): 345-362.

[42]Koech C, Kingsley M, Kyle M. Exploring the Effects of Green Portfolio on REITs’ Return Performance in South Africa[J]. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 2023, 15(1).

[43]Lanyi S C. The financialization of single-family rental housing: An examination of real estate investment trusts’ ownership of single-family houses in the Atlanta metropolitan area[J].Journal of Urban Affairs, 2020, 42(8): 1321-1341.

[44]Liang J, Jain A, Wu H. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Vary by Real Estate Asset Types? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(22).

[45]Liow K H,Addae-Dapaah K.Idiosyncratic risk,market risk and correlation dynamics in the US real estate investment trusts[J].Journal of Housing Economics,2010,19(3):205-218.

[46]Lucia G, Gianluca M. Institutional Investors and Home-Biased REITs[J]. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 2021, 27(2): 104-120.

[47]Michael J H, Lily S, Thomas M S. Economies of Scale and the Operating Efficiencyof REITs: A Revisit[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2019, 62.

[48]Muhammad Q, Atiya M, Ghazaleh A, et al. Affordable Rental Housing and Older Adults: A Case Study for Community Development Initiatives[J]. Innovation in Aging, 2020,4(Supplement1): 708-708.

[49]Natacha A. The financialization of rental housing in Tokyo[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 112(prepublish): 104463-104463.

[50]Ramya A, Julia F, Anh N. Do informed REIT market participants respond to property sector mispricing? [J]. Journal of Property Research, 2023, 40(4): 311-332.

[51]Robert D C, Chinmoy G, Milena P, Sirmans P F. Corporate Governance and Performance in the Market for Corporate Control: The Case of REITs[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2011, 42(4).

[52]Ryan G. Chacon. Tenant Concentration in REITs[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Financeand Economics, 2021.

[53]Sang I S, Hoon C, Doojin R. The information content of funds from operations and net income in real estate investment trusts[J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2020, 51.

[54]Seok W P. Asset Management Characteristics of Rental Housing REITs in Japan and Its Implications[J]. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 2019, 22(1): 36-51.

[55]Shen W L. The Stock Price Performance and Return Style of the Pan-Infrastructure Reits Corporation: Evidence from U.S. and Japan Market[J]. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2022, 14(3).

[56]Stefen M, Sherif M, A. R S, et al. Offsite construction supply chain strategies for matching affordable rental housing demand: A system dynamics approach[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 73.

[57]Timothy R, Eva S. Financial Flexibility and Manager–Shareholder Conflict: Evidence from REITs[J]. Real Estate Economics, 2020, 48(1).

[58]Yimeng S, Shengyue H. Research on Financing Risk Factors of Expressway REITs in China with a Hybrid Approach[J]. Systems, 2022, 10(2): 38-38.

[59]Zhao Y. Study on the Impact of Stock Market Performance on REITs Market in China[J]. Financial Engineering and Risk Management, 2023, 6(1).

中图分类号:

 F83    

开放日期:

 2024-06-06    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式